KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Is a 9.9% cap for rent increases in Oregon reasonable?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
489 Votes

Is a 9.9% cap for rent increases in Oregon reasonable?

Yes

1

No

12

Yes

1 Comment
Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

Rents need to keep up with the housing market or single family home rentals will disappear.

Reply

No

11 Comments
Kelli Candella
1
Kelli Candella

Government controlling the income/investment of private citizens. So dumb

Reply
Brad Livsey
1
Brad Livsey

Is a one child cap allowance reasonable for a family in Oregon? Don't laugh.......this is how the ball starts to bounce, don't you know!!

Reply
Sam Ackerman
1
Sam Ackerman

Business people do not invest in business's that have price controls on them.

Reply
Derek C Reed
Derek C Reed

Good, let the businesses go elsewhere.

Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

Just one more notch in the socialist agenda. They want to control everything and get rid of the free market.

Reply
k san
0
k san

No news we have an affordable housing problem in Bend, so why would anyone think this high of a cap is right??

Reply
GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

There are two problems. First liberals in the legislature think they (government) should run eveything and the laws consequences is rents will go higher as owners take places off the market.

Reply
John Philo
0
John Philo

The effect of the "unintended consequences" will weigh heavy on this sloppy legislation. End result will be higher rents and fewer rentals available. Good job...NOT!

Reply
Valerie Rhodes Kifer
0
Valerie Rhodes Kifer

9.9% is an outrageous increase for most working families. If the rent is 2000 per month, 9.9% is 198 per month. And if it's another 9.9 next year that would be 217 per month.

Reply
Derek C Reed
0
Derek C Reed

TOO MUCH! almost 9.9% annually is allowing a maximum of 99% every ten years

Reply
Justin Gottlieb
0
Justin Gottlieb

That is a Hell of an Interest Rate underwritten by folks living paycheck to paycheck: $99 per $1000 in monthly rent. How does that factor with other reasonable and neccessary expenses? Total not part!

Reply
Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
309 Votes

Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?

Yes

3

No

3

Yes

3 Comments
Greg James
0
Greg James

The state refused to keep people and businesses safe. Someone needed to step in.

Reply
snowzone
0
snowzone

They have the right to demonstrate but they do not have the right to damage or destroy. Apparently local enforcement couldn't handle it. Stop it asap

Reply
Carol Garside
0
Carol Garside

They are domestic terrorists, need to be stopped at any cost

Reply

No

3 Comments
Shirley Hofeld
1
Shirley Hofeld

Trump is agitating the situation. If Gov Newsom had thought it necessary he would have called them in. It was not Trump’s decision to make. Trump is merely trying to take over California because it is a mainly democratic state and he considers its citizens enemies

Reply
Ron Rommel
1
Ron Rommel

President Trump is escalating the issue.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

He's mad because California has never voted for him. Dictators do what Dictators do.

Reply
Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
298 Votes

Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?

Yes

1

No

1

Yes

1 Comment
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This is a wonderful event! I look forward to it every year! My granddaughter loves it, too!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

God created Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, I love them as a person just not there agenda

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT