Central Oregon's News Leader - KTVZ NewsChannel 21, Bend, Oregon ktvz.com
Which side do you favor: Residents or Home builders?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
2,039 Votes

Which side do you favor: Residents or Home builders?

I support the homeowners.

37

I support the construction of new homes.

0

I support the homeowners.

33 Comments
Nels Peterson
4
Nels Peterson

Residents purchased their homes based on being on a golf course & paid golf course prices. They don't deserve to all of a sudden live in the middle of a residential neighborhood, with no golf course.

Reply
CMac
3
CMac

Community was built & sold as a golf community - look at the streets (17th Tee, Fairway Heights, etc. ) & how all of the homes were marketed. This should not change after many people have made their biggest (and most important life decision) and the same builder made lots of money off them

Reply
DeBacker Melis
1
DeBacker Melis

Have b lived in Bend over 40 years. Sad to say, Bend sucks, no it really does.....

Reply
DeBacker Melis
DeBacker Melis

Minus b + f

Ltk Man
1
Ltk Man

If the homeowners win their fight (and I hope they do), I would hope each and every one pay for membership at the golf course to insure it stays in business. It's only reasonable.

Reply
k san
1
k san

MOST DEFINITELY the homeowners!!! Those people spent hundreds of thousands of dollars for their homes to be in a golfing community, and no one should be able to just change the rules of the development w/o agreement from them. I suspect they will win their lawsuit, and I hope they do!!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

I vote for the support of the owner of record of real estate owned in that development

Reply
Teri Stamos
0
Teri Stamos

I have lived on Awbrey Butte for 25 years. To think more housing will ruin what I have appreciated and taken advantage of (my whole family are golfers) just makes me angry. Bend needs this public golf course. Greed cannot continue being the driving force in the ruination of Bend.

Reply
Richard Dillard
0
Richard Dillard

If the builders had their way they would build homes so close you would have a hard time opening your door.

Reply
Ann Proctor
0
Ann Proctor

Residents bought their home because it was on a golf course. They deserve to keep that status!

Reply
Marily Sylva Badger
0
Marily Sylva Badger

This scenario has played itself out all over the country at the expense of the homeowner! Every money grubbing developer and builder is clambering over themselves to build MORE HOMES! Enough is enough already! How fast do you want to ruin what’s left of a once quiet little town?

Reply
DeBacker Melis
DeBacker Melis

Right! So sad!

Bob & Ranotta Walker
0
Bob & Ranotta Walker

The developers do whatever they want to in this town. Look at : Hidden Ridge, property at McClain and Shevlin, corner of !5th and Reed Makt, the corner of Halfway LN. and OB Riley . They CLEARCUT ALL NATIVE TREES TO PUT HOUSES IN. That doesn't have to be that way, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS!!

Reply
Susan Castle Agli
0
Susan Castle Agli

Since the beginning when River House or River Edge Investments sold homes or lots they were marketed as golf course homes. I do not think Rivers Edge Investment ever intended to try to sell the golf course as a golf course. Pahlisch announced they had purchased so everyone would assume it sold.

Reply
CampusWall Support
0
CampusWall Support

We believe the homeowners have a strong case as serious misrepresentations and deception occurred. We look forward to the homeowners prevailing in their suit to protect the community, the course, and the wildlife and beauty of River's Edge and Awbrey Butte.

Reply
Martie King
0
Martie King

They paid for a golf course view, they should get a golf course view. Otherwise, the builder/buyer should buy them out at top dollar rate.

Reply
Lloyd Corliss
0
Lloyd Corliss

I don't live on the course but I do use Mt. Washington Dr. and the impact of additional cars would be huge.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

I support the home owners, eliminating the golf course would lower their property values and increase their immediate population. IT would certainly degrade their neighborhood.

Reply
Patti
0
Patti

These homes were advertised and sold as golf course community homes. There is a fair and reasonable expectation that this community will remain in tact. People purchased homes here precisely because of the golf course and because there would be no future development.

Reply
Bryce Lenzi
0
Bryce Lenzi

They have been selling homes for 2 years stating golf course views all the time knowing that the course is going away. Bait and switch comes to mind. Where is the environmental impact study and how about the traffic study. Mt Washington is already busy. I cry fault

Reply
Bend Teacher
0
Bend Teacher

Bend doesn't have a housing problem, it has a people problem.

Reply
MB Oregon
0
MB Oregon

Phalish hid their plans to develop this property when selling houses "in a golf community" to families. They promised golf, views, nature, and more. Now they want to destroy everything that they promised purely in the name of profit. Deceiving people in this way is disgraceful. Shame on Phalish.

Reply
George Robirts
0
George Robirts

Because im one myself. And i remember that one time a land owner next door wanted to turn his property into a cinder pit , so he had to petition all thevother land owners around them. And there is no cinder pit next door. The people had their say and it stands to this day.

Reply
Kurt Miller
0
Kurt Miller

Pahlisch sold homes with golf course views in a golf course community while knowingly negotiating to purchase the golf course and build home. That is fraudulent.

Reply
Andy Rykels
0
Andy Rykels

Open public recreation space is important for the community, especially one that is based on outdoor activity. Once they're gone they won't be coming back. .

Reply
Melissa Olson
0
Melissa Olson

This project will add 4,00 daily trips to Mount Washington. Creating a traffic nightmare.

Reply
Melissa Olson
Melissa Olson

Correction 4,000 daily trips on Mt Washington

Bill Pitcher
0
Bill Pitcher

To hold developers and the City to what they represented to buyers years ago, and because their cosmetic solutions to middle housing will result in just the most expensive middle housing in Central Oregon at the cost of destroying Rivers Edge.

Reply
lstanislowski@yahoo.com
0
lstanislowski@yahoo.com

This project has been in planning stages much longer than the developer or Pahlisch Homes cares to admit. Read the CCRs for Majestic Ridge.

Reply
Fred Guajardo
0
Fred Guajardo

If we get rid of recreation areas and build and pave these areas we will ruin our beautiful city

Reply
Kenneth Emmrich
0
Kenneth Emmrich

The homeowners that border the golf course have a legal right to protect the value of their properties. We'll see if Palich Homes can bribe the right Officials to pull off another "Profit Only" subdivision similar to what Brooks Resources has done for decades.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

They want more money

Reply
Rick Martinson
0
Rick Martinson

Pahlish doesn't support Bend. They only support the opportunity to make money at the expense of our quality of life. Rampant development for the sake of the developer needs to end.

Reply
JB 1105
0
JB 1105

We're in the River Edge area, and when we heard about the proposed sale of the golf course and the insane amount of homes being proposed for the land we were shocked. The beauty of living here is the balance of open spaces to homes. If developers are able to cram in homes, like is done in California

Reply
JB 1105
JB 1105

Then we all suffer.

Steven Daniels
0
Steven Daniels

Most of these parasites are long gone before the damage they inflict on the community is realized. But, these scumbags just couldn't wait.

Reply

I support the construction of new homes.

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Should the U.S. open the strategic oil reserves to lower gas prices?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
293 Votes

Should the U.S. open the strategic oil reserves to lower gas prices?

Yes!

9

No!

7

Yes!

5 Comments
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

Biden needs to open the keystone pipeline and resume oil exploration

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

The strategic oil reserves are for times like this. We should also keep an eye on the oil companies and make sure they are not making extreme profits off the backs of the American citizens. After all that petroleum is being pumped from American taxpayers land that has been leased to these oil co.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Biden needs to resume oil exploration and open the keystone pipeline

Greg Moore
Greg Moore

No, the reserve is not for time like this, it is for times when we don't have oil available. We do have oil available now, and a LOT of oil available. It is just that Biden (and pseudo-environmentalists) don't want us to use it.

Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

The US shouldn't be relying on foreign sources of energy when we have more than enough to be energy independent again. We were energy independent just over one year ago. But that ended on day one of this administration.

Reply
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Absolutely! Prices are way too high! Just another attempt of oil companies taking advantage of a big situation like in the 1970's.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Bide the keystone pipeline and resume oil exploration

Greg Moore
Greg Moore

Explain why oil companies would not provide as much oil as possible at a time when prices are sky high. No, the prices are high due to speculation of shortage, given Biden's refusal to open up the spigot (the oil leases he claimed unused are not proven, exploration still necessary. ANWAR is KNOWN

Loretta Jones
0
Loretta Jones

Price is getting ridiculous. Average working person can't afford commuting to and from work.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Biden needs to resume oil exploration and the keystone pipeline

No!

5 Comments
Matt Cyrus
1
Matt Cyrus

We may need our reserves for war before this is over. Increase supply and lower costs by reversing Biden's orders and policies. https://americansforprosperity.org/biden-policies-raising-gas-prices/?fbclid=IwAR3jOvKpxrWnyT1iz2JrBflODu-aV7aHZdj_B4JgTndUI-8XFvAwXp3M1Jw

Reply
David Tucker
0
David Tucker

Absolutely not. Oil prices (and therefore gas prices) would drop dramatically if Congress would just reverse the disastrous executive orders Biden has put into effect restricting U.S. oil production.

Reply
Greg Moore
0
Greg Moore

Why tap into a reserve that is meant for when Oil is unavailable? We have plenty of oil available, it is just that irrational environmentalists don't want us to use it: https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2022/03/07/greenpeace_environmentalism_allowed_putin_to_invade_ukraine_820399.html

Reply
Ben Hargis
0
Ben Hargis

Don't waste the reserves......open the keyst one pipeline, increase production and exploration in the West

Reply
John Philo
0
John Philo

OPEN THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE!

Reply
Do you think home buyers should be able to send letters to sellers?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
378 Votes

Do you think home buyers should be able to send letters to sellers?

Yes, they should be able to!

7

No, I don't think it's fair!

0

Yes, they should be able to!

7 Comments
Amanda Wallace
3
Amanda Wallace

These letters allow people who can't financially compete with investors the opportunity to stand out.

Reply
Rob Mozz
2
Rob Mozz

It's your property, you should be able to use whatever information you want to decide the sale. Say I'd rather sell my property to a local family instead of a corporate developer that should be my choice.

Reply
Sussie Due
2
Sussie Due

Yes they should. That is how I sold a piece of real estate I had. Happened four years ago. Was given a higher offer from a developer but I went with the people that sent me the letter. I was able to pick who was going to live next door to me. Have never regreted it. They are the best neighbors!

Reply
Ben Hargis
0
Ben Hargis

Who cares? How is it not fair? Anyone can write a letter. Just another issue liberal politicians waste time and money on.

Reply
Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

We have a Democrat controlled legislature that thinks it should have total control over our lives even to the extent of taking away our freedom of speech.

Reply

No, I don't think it's fair!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT