KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,180 Votes

Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?

Yes, they should be loosened!

5

No, they shouldn't!

18

Yes, they should be loosened!

5 Comments
Doug Klotz
1
Doug Klotz

More housing, and lower price, is needed. Requiring parking, even when the tenants don't want to pay the cost of it, only raises housing prices, and reduces the amount that can be built on a parcel of land. If tenants want parking, and it's hard to find, developers can provide it.

Reply
Tony Jordan
1
Tony Jordan

People shouldn't be forced to purchase car parking to get housing. This won't stop parking from being built, it will provide more, much needed, housing options. People in the "No, they shouldn't!" column can pay for all the parking they want!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Absolutely!!!! In fact, why not just turn downtown Bend into a walking mall and restrict all vehicles and bicycles traffic whatsoever? Did it work in Eugene in the '70's. Absolutely not!! Most business' closed. Build apartments is akin to closing downtown Eugene. Restrice travel, close Bend retail!!

Reply
Grace Bedell
0
Grace Bedell

The government should not force auto subsidies on businesses or homes.

Reply
Byron Buck
0
Byron Buck

The younger generation are moving away from cars. Let the market decide this. People that need off street parking can seek those units. Those that don't, won't

Reply

No, they shouldn't!

18 Comments
BendDrives
2
BendDrives

Bend is already making significant changes to development codes to encourage construction. Eliminating all parking requirements is not necessary. Doing so would allow developers to avoid creating off-street parking and instead opt for on-street credits, often counting a single space multiple times.

Reply
HS
1
HS

If Bend's City Council and Planning Dept wants to continue to push people out of cars, they need to get serious about buses, bike lanes, and sidewalks - and snow clearing of sidewalks. This is just another handout our local government is giving to developers - and we voters want this to STOP.

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

Parking is a necessity!!!

Reply
robert howard
0
robert howard

way to many people in bend already, keep the californians and mexicans out.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

If parking doesn't generate money....no developer will put in but the bare minimum! Bend's bus system is not adequate for working here let alone playing here!

Reply
k san
0
k san

Parking in Bend is already a problem. Any developer would have to ensure to his potential buyers that they have adequate parking... for the usual 2-car household and for visitors.

Reply
Mike Walker
0
Mike Walker

M. Walker The city has been steadily reducing parking rates for years and the on-street parking overflowing into the surrounding neighborhood just keeps getting worse. City should follow their Comprehensive Plan Policy #39 and practice the "right-sizing" approach staff championed in Dec 2017.

Reply
Jeff Taylor
0
Jeff Taylor

Letting developers determine adequate parking in developments is a terrible idea. Having minimum parking restrictions set by the city provides at minimum, parking year round. If we run out of space for development, that’s ok too.

Reply
Linda Axelsen
0
Linda Axelsen

Until Bend’s population and culture support a realistic mass-transit system people will continue to drive personal vehicles. We already have a undesirable on-street parking problem with the minimum set. Lowering that minimum is irresponsible to the quality of life most of us are seeking here.

Reply
Caleb M.
0
Caleb M.

I know who I'm not voting for next time around. Let's just allow people to live here who don't drive a car at all. Who needs parking.

Reply
Gregory Knapp
0
Gregory Knapp

I look at existing complexes apartments etc, and the public parking is taken by people living in these living spaces. It hurts the citizens that want to use these parking spaces to use when they want to go into a store or restaurant..

Reply
David Flett
0
David Flett

Expand the UGB if builders want to make more money. This does not have to be uncontrolled sprawl. It just needs to be sensible. People with no allotted parking will park on the street. Look around, people!

Reply
Todd Brown
0
Todd Brown

Parking spots are an essential part of housing! How ludicrous this even would be considered.

Reply
Nancy
0
Nancy

Make developers pay for the land, don't make it easy for them to build more homes. Our new city counsel members need to be educated on problems this creates keep parking for residents, and make developers follow the laws in place.

Reply
Jeff Sorrick
0
Jeff Sorrick

I understand land is a premium resource in Bend. By allowing developers to make that decision regarding the number of parking space will be a disaster. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. Please please please, stop funding Visit Bend. A 5yr moratorium is needed. We don't need to advertise anymo

Reply
Connie Murray
0
Connie Murray

Just where will residents park? Can’t trust developers not to take advantage; they do already. Enough is enough.

Reply
P Robbins
0
P Robbins

Parking is a necessity whether you're in low-income or high-income housing. In an effort not to use more land for parking, the parking needs to go underground or on a lower level of the home/apartment. Ignoring the parking issue will place the parking burden on surrounding neighborhoods.

Reply
Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
309 Votes

Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?

Yes

3

No

3

Yes

3 Comments
Greg James
0
Greg James

The state refused to keep people and businesses safe. Someone needed to step in.

Reply
snowzone
0
snowzone

They have the right to demonstrate but they do not have the right to damage or destroy. Apparently local enforcement couldn't handle it. Stop it asap

Reply
Carol Garside
0
Carol Garside

They are domestic terrorists, need to be stopped at any cost

Reply

No

3 Comments
Shirley Hofeld
1
Shirley Hofeld

Trump is agitating the situation. If Gov Newsom had thought it necessary he would have called them in. It was not Trump’s decision to make. Trump is merely trying to take over California because it is a mainly democratic state and he considers its citizens enemies

Reply
Ron Rommel
1
Ron Rommel

President Trump is escalating the issue.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

He's mad because California has never voted for him. Dictators do what Dictators do.

Reply
Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
298 Votes

Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?

Yes

1

No

1

Yes

1 Comment
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This is a wonderful event! I look forward to it every year! My granddaughter loves it, too!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

God created Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, I love them as a person just not there agenda

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT