KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should Deschutes County be required to provide abortion coverage to employees?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
573 Votes

Should Deschutes County be required to provide abortion coverage to employees?

Yes

1

No

11

Yes

1 Comment
AJH
0
AJH

Abortion IS healthcare.

Reply

No

11 Comments
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
4
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

tax payers should not be paying for what is essentially an elective procedure. Abortion is not healthcare unless the life of the expectant mother is in jeopardy.

Reply
Stang1960
3
Stang1960

This was forced by the Salem socialists. The only Commissioner I would never vote for is Chang, he likes Tax Payers paying for irresponsible behavior and would like to have more Commissioners on the board that believe in the socialist democrat agenda.

Reply
Dianne Price
3
Dianne Price

They should pay like everyone else!!

Reply
Jim Hipp
3
Jim Hipp

Cover it yourself. You got pregnant on your own decision now pay for it!

Reply
Amanda
2
Amanda

They already covered abortions in situations of rape, incest, or for medical reasons. Now, they're required to cover abortions when it's simply a want and not a need. If it's not medically necessary (or in the case of rape or incest) then it shouldn't be covered by medical insurance.

Reply
sandra zollman
1
sandra zollman

They have access to other birth control methods. Use them.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
1
Kimmy Wasatch

It is a personal responsibility if you get pregnant so it is also your responsibilty if you choose abortion which means you pay ...not taxpayers !

Reply
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

No, abortion is murder even if the child is unwanted.and hurts the women, taxpayers should not be paying for it

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

Abortion shouldn't be taken lightly and used as a form of birth control, especially with taxpayer dollars.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

Absolutely not. Abortion is not women's health, it is not contraception, it is factually taking a human life period.

Reply
Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
309 Votes

Should President Trump have sent the National Guard into Los Angeles?

Yes

3

No

3

Yes

3 Comments
Greg James
0
Greg James

The state refused to keep people and businesses safe. Someone needed to step in.

Reply
snowzone
0
snowzone

They have the right to demonstrate but they do not have the right to damage or destroy. Apparently local enforcement couldn't handle it. Stop it asap

Reply
Carol Garside
0
Carol Garside

They are domestic terrorists, need to be stopped at any cost

Reply

No

3 Comments
Shirley Hofeld
1
Shirley Hofeld

Trump is agitating the situation. If Gov Newsom had thought it necessary he would have called them in. It was not Trump’s decision to make. Trump is merely trying to take over California because it is a mainly democratic state and he considers its citizens enemies

Reply
Ron Rommel
1
Ron Rommel

President Trump is escalating the issue.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

He's mad because California has never voted for him. Dictators do what Dictators do.

Reply
Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
298 Votes

Are you planning on going to any pride festivities this weekend?

Yes

1

No

1

Yes

1 Comment
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This is a wonderful event! I look forward to it every year! My granddaughter loves it, too!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

God created Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve, I love them as a person just not there agenda

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT