Husker Max

Husker Max

Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Feel better about the Husker's progress after the OSU game?

Feel better about the Husker's progress after the OSU game?

Progress is there

11

No, not seeing it

1

Progress is there

11 Comments
Randy Weitzenkamp
0
Randy Weitzenkamp

Didn't get man handled like last year. S&C is finally paying dividends. We still need to clean up things in the area of penalties and execution.

Reply
Chuck Lawson
0
Chuck Lawson

Team looked bigger. Offensive line seems stronger. A few playmakers on both sides. Not real crazy about playing so soft in defensive backfield but guess they did not want to get beat deep. Hopeful!

Reply
David Cassiday
0
David Cassiday

Effort - they played hard till the end, which they haven't always done the last two years.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

We saw for the first time in years our players showing they can play with anybody. We need some running backs, but then we are good to go.

Reply
Steve Walker
0
Steve Walker

Progress was there in terms of tackling, O/D line play, good offense decision making, and overall depth. No progress in turnovers and bad penalties and being our own worst enemy.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

I see hope. Let's add consistency to hope and we should turn some heads this year. We need to stop the mental errors (time mgmt, fumbles, penalties). There is no margin of error. Fix these =Progress

Reply
Matt Seiler
0
Matt Seiler

Even the announcers who normally hate us saw progress. Nebraska won the trenches half of the time, offense got north and south quick, linebacker play was solid finally. This team is much improved

Reply
Bob Berg
0
Bob Berg

Could have been 38-31. Should have been 45-31. But was 52-17. For every 10 good snaps there's always one drive killer. Glad that the offense went North to south and limited the sideline play. GBR

Reply
Marty Wilcox
0
Marty Wilcox

It's all about the big uglies in the trenches, and they have vastly improved.

Reply
Tucker Mcmann
0
Tucker Mcmann

Progress is there but quite honestly the celebrating of moral victories against upper echelon teams is getting a bit tired. 52 -17 is 52-17. Its a thrashing.

Reply

No, not seeing it

1 Comment
Tom Nelsen
0
Tom Nelsen

Hard to tell getting blown out yet again. I'll hope to see the improvement against lesser competition that will hopefully result in wins.

Reply
Was Trev Alberts correct in keeping Nebraska men's basketball coach Fred Hoiberg for another year?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
3/8/2022

Was Trev Alberts correct in keeping Nebraska men's basketball coach Fred Hoiberg for another year?

83%
Yes WINNER

0

17%
No

0

83%
Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

17%
No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Do you think Trev Alberts was correct to push for the coaching staff changes before season end?

Do you think Trev Alberts was correct to push for the coaching staff changes before season end?

It was right to do sooner than later

5

Should have waited until season was over

1

It was right to do sooner than later

5 Comments
Richard L. Owen
1
Richard L. Owen

The defense has made progress. The offense not so much. The real problem is Frost's dedication to Martinez. Adrian is a great guy, but his minuses exceed his pluses.

Reply
Toby Leach
0
Toby Leach

The production was there from those coaches. Better to make the decision then, so you can still have a positive impact with recruiting.

Reply
Randy Wolf
0
Randy Wolf

I imagine the transfer portal had a lot to do with the timing.

Reply
Nate Stineman
0
Nate Stineman

It had to be done and it clear that things are going to happen at NU.

Reply
Frank Johnson
0
Frank Johnson

The team was not going to become better with their existing staff. Make the cut and start improving.

Reply

Should have waited until season was over

1 Comment
Randy Weitzenkamp
0
Randy Weitzenkamp

If you are not going to make new hires before the end of the season anyway, what was the purpose in firing them now? It will be interesting to see how the offense performs, but I can't see this as beneficial.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT